BG543447910 First off: the review is very posivie! The only thing that @RagTheNutsOff has done is make improvement suggestions. as an Aeronautical Engineer and aircraft designer with over 12 years of experience, I can confirm that the vertical stabilizer / vertical fin are quite obviously undersized. In practice, the size of a vertical stabilizer is dicated by two main parameters: the distance from the CG and the speed that the plane's airspeed. as this is almost a flying wing type of configuration, the vertical stabilizer is very close to the CG and unless this model moves with 100km/h, this fin is ineffective. Additionally, the vertival fin will be ineffective at high andgles of attack due to wide nose and budy of the aircract, as it will be subjected to turbulent flow. Place the model (a centre section with the fin) into a Finite Element Fluid Dynamics Simulator and you will be able to verify what I have just explained. @tanghao and Eachine: take the comments as they are and make it better. Don't reinvent the wheel and just make a better version V2 of the model. Simple as that. Also, look uo the definition of the word "slandering". You used it multiple times but have obviously no idea what it means.

BG543447910 Hidovichino, Thank for the suggested Motor and ESC. I find the original Motor and ESC to be just powerful enough but it could be a lot better for sure. Could you please elaborate on the clockwise / counter-clockwise comment? You mentioned that the original prop is a counter-clockwise prop, but looking from behind the plane (which is how the rotational direction is defined), the prop spins clockwise - you can see this in the pictures as well. So, when looking at the plane from behind, are you suggesting a counter-clockwise spinner to be better suited? The 3-Blade - 10x7 Propeller from Master Airscrew you suggested is also a clockwise spinner, so not sure what to get now.